Re: Better estimates of index correlation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Better estimates of index correlation
Date
Msg-id 4D7EB271.70906@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Better estimates of index correlation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Better estimates of index correlation
Re: Better estimates of index correlation
List pgsql-hackers
>> As Heikki says, maybe this wouldn't be an issue at all if we can do it
>> during ANALYZE instead, but I don't know if that works.
> 
> I'm not convinced you can get a sufficiently good estimate from a small
> subset of pages.

Note that if this requires VACUUM rather than ANALYZE, it introduces a
problem for data warehousing users, who can go years between vacuums of
their largest tables.

--                                  -- Josh Berkus                                    PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                        http://www.pgexperts.com
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: really lazy vacuums?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Better estimates of index correlation