Re: Extensions vs. shared procedural language handler functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Extensions vs. shared procedural language handler functions
Date
Msg-id 4D7273B0.9010402@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Extensions vs. shared procedural language handler functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Extensions vs. shared procedural language handler functions
List pgsql-hackers

On 03/05/2011 12:17 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Dimitri Fontaine<dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>  writes:
>> Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>  writes:
>>> The only easy fix I can see at the moment is to arbitrarily create two
>>> pg_proc entries --- they can both point at the same C function, but
>>> there need to be two of 'em.
>> So for 9.1, I think you took the simplest path available.
> It's never that easy :-(.  I've been trying to figure out why frogmouth
> (Windows/cygwin buildfarm member) suddenly started failing:
>

It's mingw, not cygwin (brolga is the cygwin animal, and it doesn't 
build with python.)

But good catch on the problem.

FYI, I'm working on the MSVC issues.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Yeb Havinga
Date:
Subject: Re: Sync Rep v19
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Alpha4 release blockers (was Re: wrapping up this CommitFest)