On 2011-03-02 21:26, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>
> I think including "synchronous" is OK as long as it's properly
> qualified. Off-hand thoughts in no particular order:
>
> semi-synchronous
> conditionally synchronous
> synchronous with automatic failover to standalone
It would be good to name the concept equal to how other DBMSses call it,
if they have a similar concept - don't know if Mysql's semisynchronous
replication is the same, but after a quick read it sounds like it does.
regards,
Yeb Havinga
