Re: Re: Why our counters need to be time-based WAS: WIP: cross column correlation ... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Re: Why our counters need to be time-based WAS: WIP: cross column correlation ...
Date
Msg-id 4D6C1C14.2010909@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why our counters need to be time-based WAS: WIP: cross column correlation ...  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
> I don't understand what you're talking about at all here. I think
> there are a lot of unsolved problems in monitoring but the one thing I
> think everyone is pretty clear on is that the right way to export
> metrics like these is to export a counter and then have some external
> component periodically copy the counter into some history table and
> calculate the derivative, second derivative, running average of the
> first derivative, etc.

You missed the original point of the discussion, which was to have stats
we could use for auto-tuning internally.  Not to export them.

For example, there are optimizations we could make with the query
planner if we knew which tables and indexes were "hot" in general.
That's how we started this discussion, and it's not solved by storing
the stats history on another server.

--                                  -- Josh Berkus                                    PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                        http://www.pgexperts.com
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [ADMIN] PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag was incorrectly set happend during repeatable vacuum
Next
From: daveg
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [ADMIN] PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag was incorrectly set happend during repeatable vacuum