Re: Wiki clarification - Mailing list pgsql-www
From | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Wiki clarification |
Date | |
Msg-id | 4D67FEAD.6070108@2ndquadrant.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Wiki clarification (Mike Ellsworth <younicycle@gmail.com>) |
Responses |
Re: Wiki clarification
(Mike Ellsworth <younicycle@gmail.com>)
Re: Wiki clarification (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
List | pgsql-www |
Mike Ellsworth wrote: > I'd appreciate some clarification on usage of the Wiki. > > When it was first introduced, the usage guidelines were a bit vague - > and as I recall a statement was made (+ -) > by Josh Berkus that ~ as long as it had something to do with > PostgreSQL, it would be ok. > There are two sets of policies here. The one at http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_Wiki:About suggests the Wiki is intended for "user-contributed PostgreSQL documentation", which your page didn't quite seem to be. So by that one alone, it would be inappropriate. The rest of the policies for the project are listed at http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Policies Now, there really should be a "Wiki approval policy" for commercial content there. What Josh told you may in fact be the ultimate policy here, and there is already some other material on the wiki that is in the same fuzzy area your page appears to be. But the line here is not clearly documented yet to contributors or to site moderators. > Perhaps my expectations are a bit high, but I would think that level > would at least warrant the courtesy of an email before a wiki page was > deleted and locked. > Not really deleted--cleared and locked. Had it really been deleted I wouldn't have been able to restore the page to operation, which I just did: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Younicycle is back as you left it before. Sorry about blocking your content for a bit here, but I didn't have any idea who had put that info there. It was locked until we figured out who did, or whoever it was identified themselves after seeing the page was unavailable. In retrospect, I should have used the E-mail contact system on the wiki itself to contact you, and left a more clear suggestion on the cleared page itself as to what you should do. I'll make sure that's incorporated into the recommend procedure for when we run into a page that may not follow project policies next time. You are literally the first case like this that's happened--something commercial appeared and it wasn't obvious who posted it--so the right way to handle things hadn't been considered and documented yet. My apologies for the temporary outage here, and I would recommend you fill out your user profile at http://wiki.postgresql.org/index.php?title=User:Henryhemma&action=edit to make it clear who you are and how you can be reached so we don't have any confusion there in the future. As far as further working on that page, I would recommend waiting until you get a clear ruling here on the appropriateness of your page for the Wiki before spending any more time working on it. I doubt the page needs to get deleted altogether such that you'll lose all of the time you put into it. It may just need to be rewritten to be consistent with the goal of the wiki--user-oriented documentation related to PostgreSQL. That's not really my decision to make though, just giving my personal opinion. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg@2ndQuadrant.com Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.us