Re: disposition of remaining patches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: disposition of remaining patches
Date
Msg-id 4D6564C9.2040306@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: disposition of remaining patches  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: disposition of remaining patches  (Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas wrote:
>> 2. Synchronous replication.  Splitting up this patch has allowed some
>>     
> This has gotten a bunch of review, on several different threads.  I
> assume Simon will publish an update when he gets back to his
> keyboard...
>   

That was the idea.  If anyone has any serious concerns about the current 
patch, please don't hold off just because you know Simon is away for a 
bit.  We've been trying to keep that from impacting community progress 
too badly this week.

On top of 4 listed reviewers I know Dan Farina is poking at the last 
update, so we may see one more larger report on top of what's already 
shown up.  And Jaime keeps kicking the tires too.  What Simon was hoping 
is that a week of others looking at this would produce enough feedback 
that it might be possible to sweep the remaining issues up soon after 
he's back.  It looks to me like that's about when everything else that's 
still open will probably settle too.

-- 
Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant US    greg@2ndQuadrant.com   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support  www.2ndQuadrant.us




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Binary in/out for aclitem
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: How to extract a value from a record using attnum or attname?