On 19/02/11 11:30, Josh Berkus wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:4D5EF2F5.5070801@agliodbs.com" type="cite"><pre wrap="">
</pre><blockquote type="cite"><pre wrap="">Yeah, the disadvantage is that (like statement timeout) it is a 'bottom
of the cliff' type of protection. The advantage is there are no false
positives...
</pre></blockquote><pre wrap="">
Yeah, just trying to get a handle on the proposed feature. I have no
objections; it seems like a harmless limit for most people, and useful
to a few.
</pre></blockquote><font size="-1"><font face="Helvetica">No worries and sorry, I should have used the "per backend"
phrasein the title to help clarify what was intended.<br /><br /> Cheers<br /><br /> Mark<br /><br /></font></font>
