> On Jul 30, 2019, at 06:42, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote:
>
> (and while I do like blue for the color of the bike ;) I think that
> "distributions" is too close to "packaging" and could be confusing.
>
> Why I suggested "-extensions" is that it appears to be inclusive of
> things that augment PostgreSQL abilities, be they actual PG extensions
> or forks.
+1 for "-extensions" over "-distributions". An extension generally doesn't imply an entire distribution. When I first
saw"-distributions", my thought was, "Don't we have that list already?"
--
-- Christophe Pettus
xof@thebuild.com
