Re: LIMIT on partitioned-table!? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Shaun Thomas
Subject Re: LIMIT on partitioned-table!?
Date
Msg-id 4D5A9281.4010605@peak6.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to LIMIT on partitioned-table!?  ("Kim A. Brandt" <kimabrandt@gmx.de>)
Responses Re: LIMIT on partitioned-table!?
List pgsql-performance
On 02/15/2011 08:23 AM, Kim A. Brandt wrote:

> does `postgres (PostgreSQL) 8.4.5' use the LIMIT of a query when it
> is run on a partitioned-table or am I doing something wrong? It looks
> as if postgres queries all partitions and then LIMITing the records
> afterwards!? This results in a long (>3 minutes) running query. What
> can I do to optimise this?

Make sure you have constraint_exclusion set to 'on' in your config.
Also, what are your checks for your partitions? You've got a pretty wide
range in your 'ts' checks, so if you're using them as your partition
definition, you're not helping yourself.

The main issue might just be that you've used an order clause. LIMIT
1000 or not, even if it can restrict the result set based on your CHECK
criteria, it'll still need to select every matching row from every
matched partition, order the results, and chop off the first 1000.

--
Shaun Thomas
OptionsHouse | 141 W. Jackson Blvd. | Suite 800 | Chicago IL, 60604
312-676-8870
sthomas@peak6.com

______________________________________________

See  http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer.php
for terms and conditions related to this email

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Kim A. Brandt"
Date:
Subject: LIMIT on partitioned-table!?
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Checkpointing question