Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Date
Msg-id 4D4D0F01.6070407@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Scott Marlowe wrote:
> With a 24 drive RAID-10 array that can read at ~1GB/s I am almost
> always CPU bound during copies.  This isn't wholly bad as it leaves
> spare IO for the rest of the machine so regular work carries on just
> fine.
>

And you don't need nearly that much I/O bandwidth to reach that point.
I've hit being CPU bound on COPY...FROM on systems with far less drives
than 24.

--
Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant US    greg@2ndQuadrant.com   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support  www.2ndQuadrant.us
"PostgreSQL 9.0 High Performance": http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: table partitioning and select max(id)
Next
From: Віталій Тимчишин
Date:
Subject: Re: How to best use 32 15k.7 300GB drives?