On 02/03/2011 10:43 PM, Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
>
>> Also, a FDW allows the COPY to be used as a FROM target, giving it great
>> flexibility. AFAICT this does not.
> BTW, which do you want to improve, FDW or COPY FROM? If FDW, the better
> API would be "raw" version of NextCopyFrom(). For example:
> bool NextRawFields(CopyState cstate, char **fields, int *nfields)
> The caller FDW has responsibility to form tuples from the raw fields.
> If you need to customize how to form the tuples from various fields,
> the FDW also need to have such extensibility.
>
> If COPY FROM, we should implement all the features in copy.c
> rather than exported APIs.
The problem with COPY FROM is that nobody's come up with a good syntax
for allowing it as a FROM target. Doing what I want via FDW neatly gets
us around that problem. But I'm quite OK with doing the hard work inside
the COPY code - that's what my working prototype does in fact.
One thing I'd like is to to have file_fdw do something we can't do
another way. currently it doesn't, so it's nice but uninteresting.
cheers
andrew
