Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Date
Msg-id 4D4B3395.6010007@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...  (Mladen Gogala <mladen.gogala@vmsinfo.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...  (Mladen Gogala <mladen.gogala@vmsinfo.com>)
List pgsql-performance
> I don't want to insult anybody but the whole thing does look strange.
> Maybe we can agree to remove that ridiculous "we don't want hints" note
> from Postgresql wiki? That would make it look less like , hmph,
> philosophical issue and more "not yet implemented" issue, especially if
> we have in mind that hints are already here, in the form of
> "enable_<method>" switches.

Link? There's a lot of stuff on the wiki.


--
                                  -- Josh Berkus
                                     PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                                     http://www.pgexperts.com

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: getting the most of out multi-core systems for repeated complex SELECT statements
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...