On 1/20/2011 7:35 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Marko Tiikkaja<marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi> writes:
>> This seems useful, since the xact lock would be automatically released
>> if an error happens during "-- do something here" so you wouldn't need
>> to worry about releasing the lock elsewhere. But I'm not sure this is
>> safe. Can anyone see a problem with it?
>
> I think the POLA dictates that the behavior of that should be that you
> now have both a transactional and a nontransactional hold on the lock;
> and only the transactional hold goes away at commit.
Yes, I believe that's what happens now. But I guess you answered my
question too by not pointing out a huge flaw in that thinking.
Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja
