On 14.01.2011 14:25, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 14:16 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> None of that should conflict seriously with the synch rep code, although
>> it's hard to tell without seeing the patch. And even if it does, we'll
>> just resolve the conflict, merge conflicts are not such a big deal.
>
> It's even easier if you don't cause them in the first place.
>
> My request is not unreasonable. Please be helpful, as you would expect
> me to be if the roles were reversed.
Feel free to submit the patch against the snapshot of today. I will fix
any merge conflict that arises from changes to the base-backup stuff.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
