Re: Complier warnings on mingw gcc 4.5.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Complier warnings on mingw gcc 4.5.0
Date
Msg-id 4D08EC82.9020307@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Complier warnings on mingw gcc 4.5.0  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Complier warnings on mingw gcc 4.5.0  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 12/15/2010 11:12 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera<alvherre@commandprompt.com>  writes:
>> This bug seems closely related to process_postgres_switches.  I guess
>> it'd be useful to add some debugging printouts there to figure out
>> what's being passed the second time around.
> It strikes me that the most obvious source for a platform dependency
> there would be getopt(), in particular the arrangements to cause getopt
> to behave sanely when we invoke it on a different argc array the second
> time around.  If that were failing for some reason, you could imagine
> getopt seeing 'postgres' as the next switch to parse, which could lead
> to the reported failure.
>
> Hence:
>
> 1. Is that build using src/port/getopt.c, or a library-supplied getopt?
> What about getopt_long.c?
>
> 2. Is HAVE_INT_OPTRESET getting defined?  Should it be?
>
>             

I had the same thought. I did try forcing use of our getopt and 
getopt_long, without success, but didn't look at optreset.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Segfault related to pg_authid when running initdb from git master
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: CommitFest wrap-up