Re: Hardware recommendations - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Arjen van der Meijden
Subject Re: Hardware recommendations
Date
Msg-id 4D026A09.3080108@tweakers.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Hardware recommendations  (Andy <angelflow@yahoo.com>)
Responses Re: Hardware recommendations
Re: Hardware recommendations
List pgsql-performance
On 10-12-2010 14:58 Andy wrote:
>> We use ZFS and use SSDs for both the log device and L2ARC.  All
>> disks and SSDs are behind a 3ware with BBU in single disk mode.
>
> Out of curiosity why do you put your log on SSD? Log is all
> sequential IOs, an area in which SSD is not any faster than HDD. So
> I'd think putting log on SSD wouldn't give you any performance
> boost.

The "common knowledge" you based that comment on, may actually not be
very up-to-date anymore. Current consumer-grade SSD's can achieve up to
200MB/sec when writing sequentially and they can probably do that a lot
more consistent than a hard disk.

Have a look here: http://www.anandtech.com/show/2829/21
The sequential writes-graphs consistently put several SSD's at twice the
performance of the VelociRaptor 300GB 10k rpm disk and that's a test
from over a year old, current SSD's have increased in performance,
whereas I'm not so sure there was much improvement in platter based
disks lately?

Apart from that, I'd guess that log-devices benefit from reduced latencies.

Its actually the recommended approach from Sun to add a pair of (small
SLC-based) ssd log devices to increase performance (especially for
nfs-scenario's where a lot of synchonous writes occur) and they offer it
as an option for most of their "Unified Storage" appliances.

Best regards,

Arjen

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Andy
Date:
Subject: Re: Hardware recommendations
Next
From: Arjen van der Meijden
Date:
Subject: Re: Hardware recommendations