Re: Hot Standby btree delete records and vacuum_defer_cleanup_age - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: Hot Standby btree delete records and vacuum_defer_cleanup_age
Date
Msg-id 4D00105F.7080203@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Hot Standby btree delete records and vacuum_defer_cleanup_age  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Hot Standby btree delete records and vacuum_defer_cleanup_age  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 08.12.2010 16:00, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Heikki pointed out to me that the btree delete record processing does
> not respect vacuum_defer_cleanup_age. It should.
>
> Attached patch to implement that.
>
> Looking to commit in next few hours barring objections/suggestions, to
> both HEAD and 9_0_STABLE, in time for next minor release.

Please note that it was Noah Misch that raised this a while ago:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-11/msg01919.php

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: serializable read only deferrable
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Hot Standby btree delete records and vacuum_defer_cleanup_age