Re: Final(?) proposal for wal_sync_method changes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Final(?) proposal for wal_sync_method changes
Date
Msg-id 4CFED3CB.3000102@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Final(?) proposal for wal_sync_method changes  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 12/07/2010 07:32 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 19:00 -0500, Chris Browne wrote:
>> xof@thebuild.com (Christophe Pettus) writes:
>>> On Dec 7, 2010, at 2:43 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>>> Because nobody sane uses OSX on the server?
>>> The XServe running 10.5 server and 9.0.1 at the other end of the
>>> office takes your remark personally. :)
>> I'd heard that Apple had cancelled XServe.  [Poking back at that...]
>>
>> Yep, they won't be carrying anything for sale that's particularly
>> rack-mountable after next January.  Not precisely "dead," but definitely
>> moving on smelling funny...
> A bit off topic but Apple is actually marketing OSX Server on the mini
> (with RAID 1). Which honestly for 95% of the businesses out there would
> make a very nice, reasonably performant database server for say....
> PostBooks, or Drupal.
>

Given the constant overheating I have had on my mini, I wouldn't use it 
to host anything much ;-) But I guess YMMV.

cheers

andrerw


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Final(?) proposal for wal_sync_method changes
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: serializable read only deferrable