Re: Do we want SYNONYMS? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Michael C Rosenstein
Subject Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?
Date
Msg-id 4CFE413B.2050907@mdibl.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?  (Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-general
I won't press the issue for Postgres any further, but I will attest that
synonyms work quite elegantly in Oracle, provide valuable functionality,
and do not generally sow confusion among skilled developers.  It sounds
like the proposed "synonym" feature for Postgres perhaps had a different
intention than I assumed, however, especially due to the differences
between the Oracle and PG viz. how "users," "schemas" and "databases" work.

Thanks.

/mcr


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Daniel Verite"
Date:
Subject: Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?
Next
From: Michael C Rosenstein
Date:
Subject: Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?