Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
Date
Msg-id 4CFD225B.3020207@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 12/06/2010 12:28 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net>  writes:
>> Yeah. I'm still not convinced that using shared memory is a bad way to
>> pass these around. Surely we're not talking about large numbers of them.
>> What am I missing here?
> They're not of a very predictable size.
>
>

Ah. Ok.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: profiling connection overhead
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: profiling connection overhead