Re: We really ought to do something about O_DIRECT and data=journalled on ext4 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: We really ought to do something about O_DIRECT and data=journalled on ext4
Date
Msg-id 4CF5BD47.1040501@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: We really ought to do something about O_DIRECT and data=journalled on ext4  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: We really ought to do something about O_DIRECT and data=journalled on ext4  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 11/30/10 7:09 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
>> Apparently, testing for O_DIRECT at compile time isn't adequate.  Ideas?
> 
> We should wait for the outcome of the discussion about whether to change
> the default wal_sync_method before worrying about this.

Are we considering backporting that change?

If so, this would be another argument in favor of changing the default.

--                                  -- Josh Berkus                                    PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                        http://www.pgexperts.com
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: We really ought to do something about O_DIRECT and data=journalled on ext4
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: We really ought to do something about O_DIRECT and data=journalled on ext4