Re: wCTE behaviour - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marko Tiikkaja
Subject Re: wCTE behaviour
Date
Msg-id 4CE0413B.1010106@cs.helsinki.fi
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: wCTE behaviour  (Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: wCTE behaviour
List pgsql-hackers
On 2010-11-14 8:51 PM +0200, Yeb Havinga wrote:
> On 2010-11-14 19:35, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Marko Tiikkaja
>> <marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi>   wrote:
>>> In my opinion, all of these should have the same effect: DELETE all rows
>>> from "foo".  Any other option means we're going to have trouble predicting
>>> how a query is going to behave.
>> I think it's clear that's the only sensible behavior.
> What if CTE's ever get input parameters?

What about input parameters?


Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: a new problem in MERGE
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: max_wal_senders must die