On 11/14/2010 10:44 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> And on the fourth hand, what we're buying here is pretty marginal for
> developers and of no interest whatever for users.
>
> I still think it's worth looking into whether the bug can be dodged
> by shortening the eval calls. But if not, I think I'd vote for
> reverting. Maybe we could revisit this in a couple of years.
+1
cheers
andrew
