On 29/10/10 04:32, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Mark Kirkwood's message of jue oct 28 02:20:56 -0300 2010:
>
>> I'm guessing the index error is due to the uninitialized table pages
>> (the index "content_node_node_type_id_inserted_idx" is on the "node"
>> table).
>>
> Not necessarily ... You still have the index in that state, right?
> We could try some diagnostics on it.
>
>
>
Doing some more digging - there was an out of memory incident on the
master the previous day, so I guess both of these observations could
well be caused by leftover partially completed operations.
Mark
