Re: xlog.c: WALInsertLock vs. WALWriteLock - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Markus Wanner
Subject Re: xlog.c: WALInsertLock vs. WALWriteLock
Date
Msg-id 4CC83AC4.5090708@bluegap.ch
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: xlog.c: WALInsertLock vs. WALWriteLock  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: xlog.c: WALInsertLock vs. WALWriteLock
List pgsql-hackers
On 10/26/2010 05:52 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> And horrible for performance, I imagine.  Those locks are highly trafficked.

Note, however, that offloading this to the file-system just moves
congestion there. So we are effectively saying that we expect
filesystems to do a better job (in that aspect) than our WAL implementation.

(Note that I'm not claiming that is or is not true - I didn't measure).

Regards

Markus Wanner


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Tracking latest timeline in standby mode
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: add label to enum syntax