Re: GIN vs. Partial Indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: GIN vs. Partial Indexes
Date
Msg-id 4CC33101.1000205@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GIN vs. Partial Indexes  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: GIN vs. Partial Indexes
List pgsql-hackers
On 10/08/2010 02:44 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>  In any case, I would expect that GIN could actually do this quite
>>  efficiently.  What we'd probably want is a concept of a "null word",
>>  with empty indexable rows entered in the index as if they contained the
>>  null word.  So there'd be just one index entry with a posting list of
>>  however many such rows there are.

So, given the lack of objections to this idea, do we have a plan for 
fixing GIN?

--                                   -- Josh Berkus                                     PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                           http://www.pgexperts.com
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jesper Krogh
Date:
Subject: Re: window function count(*) and limit
Next
From: "A.M."
Date:
Subject: create c function with void argument bug?