On 10/09/2010 02:19 PM, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Gurjeet Singh
<singh.gurjeet@gmail.com> wrote:
I have attached two versions of the patch: one is context diff, and the other is the same except ignoring whitespace changes.
Attached are gzip'd patches for archives. Archive shows the previous mail attachments all inline... horrible.
I wish we could get the archive processor to provide access to the attachments even if they have a MIME type of text/whatever. That's a horrid inefficiency. Maybe we could restrict it to text attachments that have a Content-Type with a name attribute that contains the string 'patch', or a similar Content-Disposition filename attribute.
cheers
andrew