Re: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index
Date
Msg-id 4CB0B87C.3040802@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index  (Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>)
Responses archives, attachments, etc (was: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index)
List pgsql-hackers


On 10/09/2010 02:19 PM, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com> wrote:
This is a continuation from this thread: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-09/msg02153.php

The attached patch allows creating a primary key using an existing index.
 
I have attached two versions of the patch: one is context diff, and the other is the same except ignoring whitespace changes.

Attached are gzip'd patches for archives. Archive shows the previous mail attachments all inline... horrible.



I wish we could get the archive processor to provide access to the attachments even if they have a MIME type of text/whatever. That's a horrid inefficiency. Maybe we could restrict it to text attachments that have a Content-Type with a name attribute that contains the string 'patch', or a similar Content-Disposition filename attribute.

cheers

andrew

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gurjeet Singh
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index
Next
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: archives, attachments, etc (was: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index)