Re: GIN vs. Partial Indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: GIN vs. Partial Indexes
Date
Msg-id 4CAF4682.1080808@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GIN vs. Partial Indexes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> IMO, what's needed is to fix GIN so it doesn't go insane for empty
> values or non-restrictive queries, by ensuring there's at least one
> index entry for every row.  This has been discussed before; see the TODO
> section for GIN.

Well, what is that fix waiting on, then?  Oleg, Teodor?  We may even 
have a modest budget for a patch, so if funding would help, I'll ask.

--                                   -- Josh Berkus                                     PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                           http://www.pgexperts.com
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Sync Replication with transaction-controlled durability
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?)