On 10/07/2010 01:08 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Adding timeout is very little code. We can take that out of the patch if
> that's an objection.
Okay. If you take it out, we are at the wait-forever option, right?
If not, I definitely don't understand how you envision things to happen.
I've been asking [1] about that distinction before, but didn't get a
direct answer.
Regards
Markus Wanner
[1]: Re: Configuring synchronous replication, Markus Wanner:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4C9C5887.4040901@bluegap.ch
