(2010/10/07 2:05), Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> Another thing that could raise eyebrows is that I chose to remove the
>>> "missing_ok" argument from get_role_oid_or_public, so it's not a perfect
>>> mirror of it. None of the current callers need it, but perhaps people
>>> would like these functions to be consistent.
>>>
>> Tom Lane suggested to add missing_ok argument, although it is not a must-
>> requirement.
>
> Actually I think he suggested the opposite.
>
Ahh, I understood his suggestion as literal.
Well, I'd like to mark this patch as 'ready for committer'.
Thanks,
--
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
