Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?)
Date
Msg-id 4CAA2ED6.6030000@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: standby registration  (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>)
Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?)  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
>>> Quorum commit, even with configurable vote weights, can't handle a
>>> requirement that a particular commit be replicated to (A || B) && (C
>>> || D).
>> Good point.

If this is the only feature which standby registration is needed for,
has anyone written the code for it yet?  Is anyone planning to?

If not, it seems like standby registration is not *required* for 9.1.  I
still tend to think it would be nice to have from a DBA perspective, but
we should separate required from "nice to have".


--                                  -- Josh Berkus                                    PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                        http://www.pgexperts.com
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER DATABASE RENAME with HS/SR