Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 13:20, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
>> On ons, 2010-09-22 at 12:22 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> Mind you, I think bf members will need tweaking anyway, since they
>>> will assume the old style cvs layout. AFAICT, git-cvsserver will
>>> export each branch as a module, rather than one module as pgsql. We
>>> can obviously get that working for the HEAD branch (by just mapping it
>>> to a branch called pgsql), but I don't know how doable that is for
>>> backbranches.
>> We need to have a fix for this before we can do any more backbranch
>> releases.
>
> Fix for what, exactly? (assuming that people update their bf animals of course)
how exactly should people fix their BF members - is there any howto or
such on how to deal with the new git2cvs gateway?
Switching to git entirely is rather hard for some of my members for
example - at least not without investing hours of work...
Stefan
