On 09/20/2010 06:09 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Yeah, I mostly followed that thread. If such a feature was present,
> it might well make sense to use it for this; however, I've got
> enough trouble selling the SSI technology without making it
> dependent on something else which was clearly quite controversial,
> and which seemed to have some technical hurdles of its own left to
> clear. :-/
Okay, well understandable. I'm wondering how you want to implement the
memory allocation part, though.
> At the point where there is an implementation which is accepted by
> the community, I'll certainly take another look.
Fair enough, thanks.
Regards
Markus Wanner
