On 2010-09-13 4:15 PM +0300, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
> 1. WITH clause atop INSERT
> Although the previous discussion got the consensus that we forbid WITH
> atop INSERT, it seems to me that it can be allowed. I managed to do it
> by treating the top WITH clause (of INSERT) as if the one of SELECT
> (or VALUES).
In the email you referred to, Tom was concerned about the case where
these WITH lists have different RECURSIVE declarations. This patch
makes both RECURSIVE if either of them is. I can think of cases where
that might lead to surprising behaviour, but the chances of any of those
happening in real life seem pretty slim.
> It is possible to disallow the CTE over INSERT statement,
> but the lack for INSERT, though there are for UPDATE and DELETE,
> sounds inconsistent enough.
Also because wCTEs are not allowed below the top level, not being able
to use INSERT as the top level statement would force people to wrap that
INSERT in another CTE.
Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja
