Re: pg_ctl emits strange warning message - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: pg_ctl emits strange warning message
Date
Msg-id 4C8E44B7.2010608@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_ctl emits strange warning message  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_ctl emits strange warning message  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 13/09/10 18:19, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>  writes:
>> Yet another idea: Check in pg_ctl if recovery.conf is also present. If
>> it is, assume we're in recovery and don't print that warning. That would
>> be dead simple.
>
> +1.  This sounds like a much more appropriate approach.

Hmm, looking at this more closely, I'm a bit confused. We already rename 
away backup_label at the beginning of recovery. Under what circumstances 
do we have a problem? This starts to seem like a complete non-issue to me.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_ctl emits strange warning message
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion