Re: postgres patch for autovacuum error in postgres - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: postgres patch for autovacuum error in postgres
Date
Msg-id 4C899C0B.8060905@postnewspapers.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to postgres patch for autovacuum error in postgres  ("tamanna madaan" <tamanna.madan@globallogic.com>)
Responses Re: postgres patch for autovacuum error in postgres  (Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>)
Re: postgres patch for autovacuum error in postgres  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 09/10/2010 04:38 AM, tamanna madaan wrote:

> Due to some reason I don’t want to upgrade to postgres-8.1.6.

Why? Seriously?

If Oracle announced that they were releasing a patch for six critical
data-loss bugs in 9i, one of which affected you, would you call support
and ask them to make a custom patch just for you that only fixed the one
you had encountered?

If Microsoft released a patch to Internet Explorer that fixed four crash
bugs and a security hole, would you try to extract just the security
hole fix from the patched binary and apply only that change?

Seriously, this makes no sense. In Windows terms, you're  not being told
to upgrade from XP to Vista to fix a bug, or even from XP SP1 to XP SP2.
You're being told to apply a targeted set of fixes - like you receive
from automatic updates - to fix known specific problems without changing
anything else unnecessarily.

--
Craig Ringer

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: error while autovacuuming
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres patch for autovacuum error in postgres