Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Markus Wanner
Subject Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process
Date
Msg-id 4C7BCEB3.3030900@bluegap.ch
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 08/30/2010 04:52 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Let me just point out that awhile back we got a *measurable* performance
> boost by eliminating a single indirect fetch from the buffer addressing
> code path.

I'll take a look a that, thanks.

> So I don't have any faith in untested assertions

Neither do I. Thus I'm probably going to try my approach.

Regards

Markus Wanner


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Assertion failure on HEAD (or at least git copy of it)
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: string function - "format" function proposal