Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Markus Wanner
Subject Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process
Date
Msg-id 4C764503.70906@bluegap.ch
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process  (Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process
List pgsql-hackers
On 08/26/2010 05:01 AM, Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
> Markus, do you need B? Or A + standard backend processes are enough?
> If you need B eventually, starting with B might be better.

No, I certainly don't need B.

Why not just use an ordinary backend to do "user defined background 
processing"? It covers all of the API stability and the security issues 
I've raised.

Regards

Markus Wanner


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Marko Tiikkaja
Date:
Subject: Re: gSoC add MERGE command new patch -- merge_v104
Next
From: Itagaki Takahiro
Date:
Subject: Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process