Re: JSON Patch for PostgreSQL - BSON Support? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: JSON Patch for PostgreSQL - BSON Support?
Date
Msg-id 4C69DA0C.7010403@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: JSON Patch for PostgreSQL - BSON Support?  (Joseph Adams <joeyadams3.14159@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: JSON Patch for PostgreSQL - BSON Support?  (Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> but BSON pidgenholes numeric values to either double, int32, int64, or
> a 12-byte MongoDB Object ID.  Thus, for people who expect JSON to be
> able to hold arbitrary-precision numbers (which the JSON data type in
> my patch can), using BSON for transfer or storage will violate that
> expectation.

Good lord.  I'd suggest that maybe we wait for BSON v. 2.0 instead.

Is BSON even any kind of a standard?

--                                  -- Josh Berkus                                    PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                        http://www.pgexperts.com
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: KaiGai Kohei
Date:
Subject: Re: security label support, part.2
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Todays git migration results