Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: DropRelFileNodeBuffers API change (was Re: [BUGS] BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: DropRelFileNodeBuffers API change (was Re: [BUGS] BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues)
Date
Msg-id 4C6852A2.70503@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to DropRelFileNodeBuffers API change (was Re: [BUGS] BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: DropRelFileNodeBuffers API change (was Re: [BUGS] BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 15/08/10 21:58, Tom Lane wrote:
> Does anyone have an opinion whether it's likely that any third-party
> code is calling DropRelFileNodeBuffers directly?

I doubt it. External modules shouldn't be modifying relations at such a 
low level.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: assertions and constraint triggers
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: LockDatabaseObject vs. LockSharedObject