On 11/08/10 14:44, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 13:25 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>
>> I concur that Boxuan's suggested "difficult" approach seems like the
>> right one.
>
> Right, but you've completely ignored my proposal: lets do this in two
> pieces. Get what we have now ready to commit, then add support for
> partitioning later, as a second project.
It seems like a pretty serious omission. What would you do, thrown a
"MERGE to inherited tables not implemented" error?
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
