On 09/08/10 21:26, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> The behavior of empty arrays with dimensions is weird in general.
>
> Agreed, but we shouldn't be introducing random restrictions in the name
> of security.
>
> Patch looks good to me, except that it occurs to me to wonder about
> negative values of dim[i]. For small negative values this coding
> will catch it, but what if it's large enough to overflow the other way?
> Maybe use
>
> if (dim[i]< 0 || lBound[i]> ub)
> ereport...
ArrayGetNItems checks for dim[i] < 0. I concur though that it looks
weird to not check that along with the overflow check, so maybe we
should, just to make the code clearer.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com