Re: pg_stat_user_functions' notion of user - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: pg_stat_user_functions' notion of user
Date
Msg-id 4C5F4E93.2000601@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stat_user_functions' notion of user  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 8/8/10 8:40 AM, David Fetter wrote:
>> Would anyone object to changing it to make it more consistent with
>> other others?  And since we're jollily making catalog changes in 9.0
>> still, could this also be backpatched?

I'd object.  It's not a bug (arguable spec, maybe, but working as
spec'd), and it's not trivial, and it's functionality we've already
released.

-1 from me for doing anything in 9.0

--                                  -- Josh Berkus                                    PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                        http://www.pgexperts.com
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stat_user_functions' notion of user
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch review: make RAISE without arguments work like Oracle