Re: Concurrent MERGE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: Concurrent MERGE
Date
Msg-id 4C5AB1350200002500034267@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Concurrent MERGE  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> So...  No, it's not directly a problem on the server itself.
I just had a thought -- the MERGE code isn't doing anything fancy
with snapshots, is it?  I haven't been tracking that discussion too
closely or read the patch.  My previous comments assume that the
*snapshot* is stable for the duration of a MERGE command, at least
if the transaction isolation level is serializable.
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Concurrent MERGE
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: remove upsert example from docs