Re: lock_timeout GUC patch - Review - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: lock_timeout GUC patch - Review
Date
Msg-id 4C56E02F02000025000340A4@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: lock_timeout GUC patch - Review  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I wonder whether this patch shouldn't be rejected with a request
>> that the timeout framework be submitted to the next CF.
> I think "Returned with Feedback" would be more appropriate than
> "Rejected", since we're asking for a rework, rather than saying -
> we just don't want this.  But otherwise, +1.
Done.
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: lock_timeout GUC patch - Review
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance