Re: Autovacuum missing tables - Mailing list pgsql-admin
From | Bryan Payne |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Autovacuum missing tables |
Date | |
Msg-id | 4C52F342.6050400@speedfc.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Autovacuum missing tables (Brad Nicholson <bnichols@ca.afilias.info>) |
Responses |
Re: Autovacuum missing tables
|
List | pgsql-admin |
Yeah, this is one that is only occasionally busy. The other tables in question have been getting autovacuumed as of late, but we had a span of about a week where it was getting passed up. I'm going to check out the vacuum_cost_limit someone mentioned and see where that takes me. Thanks for everyone's help. On 07/30/2010 10:36 AM, Brad Nicholson wrote: > On 10-07-30 11:10 AM, Bryan Payne wrote: > >> Version: >> PostgreSQL 8.3.7 on i486-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC cc (GCC) 4.2.4 >> (Ubuntu 4.2.4-1ubuntu3) >> >> Postgresql.conf: >> data_directory = '/var/lib/postgresql/8.3/main' >> hba_file = '/etc/postgresql/8.3/main/pg_hba.conf' >> ident_file = '/etc/postgresql/8.3/main/pg_ident.conf' >> external_pid_file = '/var/run/postgresql/8.3-main.pid' >> listen_addresses = '*' >> port = 5432 >> max_connections = 550 >> ssl = true >> shared_buffers = 1GB >> work_mem = 24MB >> maintenance_work_mem = 256MB >> max_fsm_pages = 1300000 >> archive_mode = off >> enable_seqscan = off >> log_destination = 'syslog' >> log_directory = 'pg_log' >> log_filename = 'postgresql-%Y-%m-%d_%H%M%S.log' >> log_rotation_age = 1d >> log_min_duration_statement = 2000 >> log_connections = true >> log_line_prefix = '%t<%u%%%d> ' >> autovacuum = on >> datestyle = 'iso, mdy' >> lc_messages = 'en_US.UTF-8' >> lc_monetary = 'en_US.UTF-8' >> lc_numeric = 'en_US.UTF-8' >> lc_time = 'en_US.UTF-8' >> default_text_search_config = 'pg_catalog.english' >> backslash_quote = off >> >> Table info (this table shows last autovacuum on 7/28): >> hostname=> VACUUM ANALYZE VERBOSE hierarchy_pull; >> INFO: vacuuming "public.hierarchy_pull" >> INFO: "hierarchy_pull": found 0 removable, 1906 nonremovable row >> versions in 78 pages >> DETAIL: 0 dead row versions cannot be removed yet. >> There were 2714 unused item pointers. >> 47 pages contain useful free space. >> 0 pages are entirely empty. >> CPU 0.00s/0.00u sec elapsed 0.00 sec. >> INFO: vacuuming "pg_toast.pg_toast_17600" >> INFO: index "pg_toast_17600_index" now contains 0 row versions in 1 >> pages >> DETAIL: 0 index row versions were removed. >> 0 index pages have been deleted, 0 are currently reusable. >> CPU 0.00s/0.00u sec elapsed 0.00 sec. >> INFO: "pg_toast_17600": found 0 removable, 0 nonremovable row >> versions in 0 pages >> DETAIL: 0 dead row versions cannot be removed yet. >> There were 0 unused item pointers. >> 0 pages contain useful free space. >> 0 pages are entirely empty. >> CPU 0.00s/0.00u sec elapsed 0.00 sec. >> INFO: analyzing "public.hierarchy_pull" >> INFO: "hierarchy_pull": scanned 78 of 78 pages, containing 1906 live >> rows and 0 dead rows; 1906 rows in sample, 1906 estimated total rows >> VACUUM >> >> > Autovacuum won't vacuum this table as it stands as there are no dead > rows. There is no work for vacuum to do, so it's just a waste of cycles > to run it. Of course, your manual vacuum may have cleared out the dead > tuples, but based on the fact that there are not any more in place, I > wonder about the activity on the table. When you say the tables are > busy - define what you mean by busy in terms of INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE? > > The docs explain how autovacuum calculates when to vacuum tables to > vacuum here: > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/routine-vacuuming.html#AUTOVACUUM > > If the table is not being vacuumed frequently enough, you may need to > change your autovacuum settings. > > > > >> On 07/30/2010 09:46 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote: >> >>> Bryan Payne<bpayne@speedfc.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Autovacuum is sometimes skipping certain tables. The tables in >>>> question are pretty busy. A vacuum analyze works fine when run >>>> manually. The tables in question were successfully autovacuumed >>>> this morning, but that is the first time since the 23rd where it >>>> worked. I'm not finding any logging info regarding the autovacuum. >>>> I'm not sure if autovacuum is seeing table locks or what, but is >>>> there a way to run a more aggressive autovacuum? >>>> >>> For starters, we need to know what version of PostgreSQL this is: >>> >>> select version(); >>> >>> It wouldn't hurt to see the contents of your postgresql.conf (with >>> all comments removed) and to know something about the table, and how >>> it's used. One way to get that information would be: >>> >>> VACUUM ANALYZE VERBOSE tablename; >>> >>> -Kevin >>> . >>> >>> >> > >
pgsql-admin by date: