Re: PostGIS vs. PGXS in 9.0beta3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mark Cave-Ayland
Subject Re: PostGIS vs. PGXS in 9.0beta3
Date
Msg-id 4C5012F5.8090005@siriusit.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostGIS vs. PGXS in 9.0beta3  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> No, the configure test is wrong. Here's what's in configure.ac:
> 
> 
>    dnl Temporary hack until minimum PostgreSQL version is 8.5:
>    dnl If PostgreSQL < 8.5 is detected, trigger the inclusion of the
>    new versioned PGXS targets
>    PGXSOVERRIDE=0
>    if test ! "$PGSQL_MINOR_VERSION" -ge 5; then
>            PGXSOVERRIDE=1
>    fi
> 
> 
> Of course, we don't have any such thing as 8.5.

Ah wait - I see. The fix is in already in the 1.5 branch, it just hasn't 
hit a release yet :(

http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/changeset/5421/branches/1.5/configure.ac

Looks like we need to push a new release in time for 9.0...


ATB,

Mark.

-- 
Mark Cave-Ayland - Senior Technical Architect
PostgreSQL - PostGIS
Sirius Corporation plc - control through freedom
http://www.siriusit.co.uk
t: +44 870 608 0063

Sirius Labs: http://www.siriusit.co.uk/labs


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Yeb Havinga
Date:
Subject: Re: Query optimization problem
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby