Re: non-overlapping, consecutive partitions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marko Tiikkaja
Subject Re: non-overlapping, consecutive partitions
Date
Msg-id 4C49F86D.9030301@cs.helsinki.fi
Whole thread Raw
In response to non-overlapping, consecutive partitions  (Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres@cybertec.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 7/23/2010 11:04 PM, Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:
> does anybody see a solution to this problem?
> what are the main showstoppers to make something like this work?

I think we should absolutely make this work when we have a good 
partitioning implementation.

That said, I don't think it's wise to put a lot of effort into making 
this work with our current partitioning method when the partitioning 
patches are just around the corner.  The developer time should be 
directed at those patches instead.


Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Marko Tiikkaja
Date:
Subject: Re: Rewrite, normal execution vs. EXPLAIN ANALYZE
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: patch: to_string, to_array functions