Re: tune memory usage for master/slave nodes in cluster - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: tune memory usage for master/slave nodes in cluster
Date
Msg-id 4C470D74.8010509@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to tune memory usage for master/slave nodes in cluster  (stanimir petrov <cristal_reaver@abv.bg>)
List pgsql-performance
stanimir petrov wrote:
> Now the servers are dual core CPU 2.6 with 1.7 GB RAM and i standart
> disk. (the small instance from AWS)

You're never going to be able to tune for writing data fast on a AWS
environment; there just isn't enough disk throughput available.  If this
application really does take off the way you expect it to, don't be
surprised to find you have to move it to real hardware to keep up.
Dedicated database servers tend to have tens of disks in them to keep up
with the sort of load you're expecting, and you just can't get that in a
cloud environment.  You can do some work to improve I/O using multiple
storage instances;
http://blog.endpoint.com/2010/02/postgresql-ec2-ebs-raid0-snapshot.html
is a good introduction to that.

The basic tuning advice you're looking for is available at
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Tuning_Your_PostgreSQL_Server

If you are trying to get faster writes out of AWS hardware, you may have
to turn off synchronous_commit to accomplish that.  That has some
potential lost transaction downsides, but simple disks just can't write
data that fast so it may be the only way to make this work well.

--
Greg Smith  2ndQuadrant US  Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg@2ndQuadrant.com   www.2ndQuadrant.us


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Using more tha one index per table
Next
From: "Kneringer, Armin"
Date:
Subject: Re: potential performance gain by query planner optimization