-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Steve Atkins wrote:
> But choosing a
> proprietary format that's only supported by a single tool, and
> that renders to horrible quality PNGs is something we'll regret,
> I think.
I think we should keep to the facts and you are not doing it here.
Can you explain how you got to the conclusion that dia renders to
horrible quality PNGs? Because this not what I and many have experienced
when generating PNG files with dia.
regards,
- --
Rafael Martinez, <r.m.guerrero@usit.uio.no>
Center for Information Technology Services
University of Oslo, Norway
PGP Public Key: http://folk.uio.no/rafael/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkxC05sACgkQBhuKQurGihScPQCeKynNzLwvJx4KIrbzJ/+ADDeJ
b7IAnA7e4MYA5gOXJ1ip5nTa0Yeou2PX
=Onxk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
